Why Did People Obey Harmful Orders?

When we think about human behavior, one of the most puzzling questions is this: Why do ordinary people sometimes follow harmful orders, even when they know it could hurt others? This question became urgent in the 1950s and 1960s, shortly after the horrors of World War II. During the Nuremberg Trials, many Nazi officers defended their crimes by saying they were “just following orders.” Psychologists wanted to understand if obedience to authority was something unique to those individuals, or if it was part of human nature itself.

In this context, a young social psychologist named Stanley Milgram at Yale University designed one of the most famous — and controversial — psychology experiments in history: the Milgram Experiment on obedience to authority.

The Milgram study was not just another psychology experiment. It became a cultural milestone, shaking our understanding of human morality, free will, and the power of authority. Even today, more than sixty years later, it is still discussed in classrooms, psychology courses, documentaries, and books around the world.

The experiment was shocking — not because of physical pain (the electric shocks were fake), but because of the emotional and ethical consequences. Participants believed they were administering real shocks to another person. Many of them continued, even as the “learner” screamed in pain, simply because an authority figure told them to proceed.

In this article, we will explore the Milgram Experiment in depth:

What exactly happened during the study?
Why was it so controversial?
What did the results reveal about human behavior?
And finally, what lessons can we learn today about obedience, authority, and ethical research?

The story of Stanley Milgram’s obedience study is not only about psychology — it is about the human condition itself. Let’s dive in.

Inside the Milgram Experiment: How It Worked

To understand why the Milgram Experiment became so famous, we need to look at how it was designed. Stanley Milgram wanted to create a realistic setting where ordinary people would feel pressure from an authority figure, then measure how far they would go in obeying instructions that seemed harmful.

The Setup

The study took place at Yale University in the early 1960s. Participants were recruited through newspaper ads and were told they would take part in a “memory and learning experiment.” Each volunteer was paid simply for showing up, regardless of the outcome.

When a participant arrived, they met two people:

The “experimenter” (a man in a lab coat, representing authority).
Another supposed “volunteer” (actually an actor, called the learner).

The participant was always assigned the role of “teacher”, while the actor played the “learner.” The teacher’s job was to test the learner’s memory by asking word-pair questions. If the learner answered incorrectly, the teacher was instructed to give them an electric shock — increasing the voltage each time.

The Shock Machine

In front of the teacher stood a large machine with switches labeled from 15 volts (“slight shock”) up to 450 volts (“XXX – danger: severe shock”).

At first, shocks were mild.
But as mistakes continued, the shocks escalated.
The labels on the machine made the experience feel terrifyingly real.

Of course, no real shocks were given. The learner was an actor, only pretending to be in pain. But the teacher (the real subject) did not know this.

The Role of the Authority

Whenever a teacher hesitated, the experimenter in the lab coat would calmly but firmly say things like:

“Please continue.”
“The experiment requires that you go on.”
“It is absolutely essential that you continue.”
“You have no other choice; you must go on.”

This simple pressure from authority was enough to make many participants keep going — even when they believed they were seriously hurting another human being.

Why This Was Shocking

The expectation before the study was that very few people (less than 1%) would continue giving shocks all the way to the maximum level. After all, how could an ordinary person intentionally inflict such pain?

But Milgram’s results told a different, much darker story about human obedience.

What Did the Milgram Experiment Reveal?

When Stanley Milgram first designed his study, he asked professional psychologists, professors, and students to predict the outcome. Almost everyone agreed: very few people would go all the way to the maximum 450 volts. Many believed only a tiny percentage of participants — maybe 1 in 1,000 — would be so obedient to authority that they would deliver the highest shock.

The reality turned out to be far more disturbing.

The Actual Results

About 65% of participants continued to the very end, delivering what they believed to be a 450-volt shock marked as “Danger: Severe Shock.”
Every participant went at least to 300 volts before refusing or continuing.
Many subjects showed extreme emotional stress — sweating, trembling, biting their lips, even laughing nervously. But despite their discomfort, a majority obeyed the authority figure.

These results shocked not only the scientific community but also the general public. It seemed to suggest that ordinary people are capable of committing harmful actions if ordered by someone in a position of power.

Obedience Over Conscience

The Milgram Experiment revealed a chilling truth: many people prioritize obedience to authority over their own moral judgment. Even when participants heard the learner screaming in pain, begging for the shocks to stop, they continued.

This raised important questions:

Were the participants cruel by nature?
Or was the social pressure of authority strong enough to override their conscience?

Milgram argued the second explanation: that the situation itself — the presence of authority, the structured setting of Yale University, and the responsibility placed on the “experimenter” — created a powerful psychological force that led people to obey.

Wider Impact

The findings had huge implications. They suggested that atrocities, such as those committed during wartime, might not only be caused by “evil people,” but by ordinary individuals acting under orders.

In other words, the Milgram Experiment forced the world to confront an uncomfortable reality: the capacity for harmful obedience exists in nearly everyone.

The Ethical Debate: Why the Milgram Experiment Was Controversial

While the Milgram Experiment became one of the most famous psychology studies of the 20th century, it also became one of the most criticized. Many questioned whether the experiment itself was ethical, even if it revealed powerful insights about human behavior.

The Use of Deception

One of the biggest concerns was deception. Participants were told they were part of a memory and learning study, not an obedience experiment. They genuinely believed they were delivering painful electric shocks to another person.

This deception created psychological stress, with many subjects visibly suffering during the process.
Some participants later reported long-lasting discomfort, feeling guilty for their actions.

Psychological Harm

Even though no physical harm was done, the emotional toll was real. Many participants experienced high levels of anxiety, sweating, trembling, and even uncontrollable laughter due to stress.
The idea that people left the lab realizing they were capable of harming others deeply unsettled them.

Lack of Informed Consent

Today, ethical guidelines in psychology demand that participants must give informed consent, meaning they understand the real purpose and potential risks of a study before agreeing.
In Milgram’s case, participants did not truly know what they were signing up for — raising questions about whether their participation was fair.

The Defense of Milgram

Milgram defended his work by pointing out that:

Participants were fully debriefed afterward and told the shocks were fake.
Follow-up interviews showed that a majority of participants said they were glad to have taken part, despite the stress.
The results provided critical insights into human behavior that might not have been discovered otherwise.

Influence on Research Ethics

Because of the controversy, the Milgram Experiment helped shape modern ethical standards in psychology. Today, studies must pass strict review boards, ensure minimal risk, and fully inform participants about their rights.

The Bigger Question

The debate about Milgram’s study remains alive: Was the knowledge gained worth the emotional cost? While some argue that it crossed ethical boundaries, others believe the lessons about obedience and authority were too important to ignore.

What Can We Learn from the Milgram Experiment?

The Milgram Experiment may have taken place more than sixty years ago, but its lessons are just as relevant — perhaps even more so — in today’s world. Understanding obedience to authority is not just an academic exercise; it touches politics, workplaces, education, law enforcement, and everyday human interactions.

Lesson 1: Ordinary People Can Commit Harm Under Authority

The biggest lesson from Milgram’s study is that ordinary people — not just “evil” individuals — can carry out harmful actions when ordered by an authority figure.
This challenges the comforting belief that atrocities are committed only by cruel or unusual personalities. Instead, the study suggests that under the right conditions, anyone might obey destructive orders.

Lesson 2: The Power of Social Pressure

The experiment highlights how strong social pressure can be. In a respected setting (like Yale University) and with a figure of authority (a man in a lab coat), participants felt compelled to continue, even against their conscience.
This shows how context and environment shape behavior as much as personal morality.

Lesson 3: Responsibility Shifts to Authority Figures

Many participants justified their actions by saying they were “just following orders.” This mindset reduces personal responsibility and allows harmful systems to continue.
The Milgram study reminds us that we must remain morally accountable for our choices, even when following authority.

Lesson 4: Ethical Standards in Research Are Essential

The controversy surrounding Milgram’s methods forced psychology as a discipline to adopt stricter ethical standards.
Today, institutional review boards (IRBs) ensure that participants give informed consent, know their rights, and can withdraw without penalty. Without Milgram’s study, the evolution of ethical research might have been slower.

Lesson 5: Applications in Modern Society

Workplaces: Employees may obey unethical instructions from bosses if they feel pressured.
Military and law enforcement: Soldiers and officers may carry out questionable orders under authority.
Politics and propaganda: Leaders can manipulate obedience to justify harmful policies.

In all these cases, the Milgram Experiment warns us to stay vigilant, ask questions, and remember that authority should not override human conscience.

Final Thoughts

The Milgram Experiment remains one of the most famous — and unsettling — psychology studies in history. Its legacy lives on in classrooms, research, and ethical debates. More importantly, it forces each of us to reflect on a difficult question:

If we were in the same position as Milgram’s participants, would we obey? Or would we resist?

That question keeps the experiment alive in our cultural memory and ensures its lessons continue to shape how we think about authority, obedience, and human responsibility.

📚 References & Sources

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority. Harper & Row.
Blass, T. (2004). The Man Who Shocked the World: The Life and Legacy of Stanley Milgram. Basic Books.
American Psychological Association (APA). (2012). Ethics Code. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2017). 50 Years of "Obedience to Authority": From Blind Obedience to Engaged Followership. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 59–78.

🔑 Keywords to highlight across the post: Milgram Experiment, obedience to authority, Stanley Milgram study, psychology experiment, research ethics, human behavior.

Search This Blog

proximacare